«IMAGINE THIS scenario: in the half-light of a March morning in 2027, Russian armoured units cross the Latvian border near Rezekne, seize the rail station and turn south toward Daugavpils, Latvia’s second city, half of whose population is ethnically Russian. Capitalising on the fruits of a malign influence campaign, their aim is to seize a sliver of territory on the pretext that “Russian-speaking communities” require Moscow’s protection. Russian troops rapidly build fixed positions and deploy mobile air defences, while their president, Vladimir Putin, still basking in the glow of newly acquired lands in the Donbas, waits for NATO to decide how to respond.
In Washington, the response is what the Europeans had feared. President Donald Trump informs them that America will not fight a European war over a slice of Latvia that, he claims, is basically Russian anyway. Russia is just too powerful to fight and, as in Ukraine, will just grind it out. Besides, Mr Trump argues, European weakness practically invited this incursion in the first place. He calls for “peace” on social media, but will send no troops, no heavy lift and no fighter jets—though Europeans are welcome to purchase American weapons.
The fictional land-grab in Latvia invites NATO to think the previously unthinkable: can the alliance, without America, contain and then repel a Russian advance?
